| 70 |
The Story of the Jewish Defense League |
bformed the Jewish community that it was satisfied that the
bsigners of the ad were “a radical and tiny fringe of the Black
bcommunity and in no way representative of it.”
bThis was the blindness and madness of the Jewish Estab-
blishment and the liberal spokesman whose attitude was so
bincredibly summed up in a New Republic article called
b“Inflating the Threat of Black Anti-Semitism.”
bHow different the perception and frankness of Nazi
bleader George Lincoln Rockwell, who in his Rockwell
bReport as far back as March 1, 1963, wrote: “And in the last
btwo or three years the Negroes are becoming anti-Semitic by
bthe millions . . . the situation with American Negroes is
balready dynamite for the Jews.”
bThe reaction of the Jewish leadership defied belief. Years
bafter Mattapan, Dorchester, and Roxbury—once bustling,
bproud, and happy Boston Jewish communities—had died
band the wealthy and fortunate Jews had fled to Brookline
band Newton, the Boston Jewish Advocate, spokesman for
bthe Jews who did not live in the disaster areas and who did
bnot feel the terror, the crime, and the nightmare, could
bwrite in its December 26, 1968, issue that it was “hard put to
bproduce specific instances of anti-Jewish manifestations”
band that “the Boston Black-Jewish problem has its sharpest
bfocus in the understandable [sic] desire of Blacks to obtain
bpossession of synagogues and other Jewish institutional
bproperties on what is now ‘Black turf’”. Rabbi Bernard
bWeinberger, comfortable and well-paid official for the
bAnti-Poverty Program, could look at the Jewish merchant
bwho had put a lifetime into a business, had been in the
bneighborhood for at least as long as Blacks had been there,
band seen his life work threatened, and calmly tell him: “It
bmay be painful, but I know that if a Jew has a store in the
bheart of Bedford-Styvesant he would be well advised to get
bout.” Rabbi Maurice Eisendrath, one of the sickest of the
bself-hating Jewish leaders, could go through life never once
braising his voice on behalf of the oppressed Jew and yet, as
blate as October 1969, tell the Reform Jewish group he
bheaded that the time had come for a “Jewish manifesto” to
b