| 184 |
The Story of the Jewish Defense League |
ban end to foreign ‘adventures’ and a humiliating defeat for
bthe United States in southeast Asia, is a man who will create
bthe kind of isolationism that will breed Munich after
bMunich. He will remove the fear of an American deterrent
bfrom the path of Soviet and other Communist aggression;
bhe will drive small states into an accommodation with the
bSoviets and other Communist aggressors that will make
bmere protectorates and satellites of them and will doom
bcertain states to slavery and destruction. Israel stands in this
blatter category.
b“Have we gone insane? Do American Jews not realize
bthat, but for American power and military credibility, the
bState of Israel would be in a terrible, precarious situation?
bJewish interest and American interest all dictate a tough and
bfirm policy against the Soviets and a tough and firm armed
bforces to back up that policy and make it believable. George
bMcGovern is not the kind of a man who will support a tough
banti-Soviet policy or an anti-Communist line. In his mind,
banti-Communism is a relic of the cold war ‘warriors’ and a
bthing to be discarded.
b“Is George McGovern good for liberals? I suppose so. Is
bhe good for the Jews? Emphatically not. Now is the time for
bthe Jew to decide what, for him, is more important.”
bIt was just this thinking that led us to go against the Jewish
bstream of thought on the controversial question of Vietnam.
bThere was not a major Jewish group that, by 1970 was not
bopposed to United States policy in Vietnam and some, like
bthe horrendous American Jewish Congress, spent vast
bamounts of time and Jewish money attacking Nixon on this
bissue. More, there was not a campus where opinion was not
boverwhelmingly against United States involvement in
bSoutheast Asia, and it was precisely in this climate that JDL
bcame out squarely against a United States withdrawal.
bAt a press conference at the Overseas Press Club on May
b19, 1970, I maintained that the results of the war in Vietnam
bhad a direct bearing on the future of Israel and the conflict
bin the Middle East, declaring that a U.S. defeat in Indochina
bwould “guarantee escalation of the war in other areas.” I
binsisted that the great majority of Israelis and the Israeli
b