| 286 |
The Story of the Jewish Defense League |
bI began by looking at the wealthy youngsters who had never
bknown and never raised a voice on behalf of Jewish poor,
bthe oppressed Jewish neighborhoods, Soviet Jews, and said:
b“Dear NFTY, I am ashamed at your silence.” The
byoungsters sat and listened for an hour to things they had
bnever heard before, and when I left, the seeds of another
brevolution had been sown in at least a few more young
bJewish hearts.
bIn August 1971 the Omaha, Nebraska, ADL-Community
bRelations Committee followed national orders and dutifully
bvoted to condemn the JDL—except for one voice. Mrs.
bMickey Gerelick, the editor of the local paper, the Jewish
bPress, said she was opposed to many of the JDL activities but
bwas “disturbed” by the vote, asking: “Do we really believe
bthat by ignoring or opposing them, the JDL will go away?”
b“I’m not sure,” she continued, “where JDL activities fail. I
bam sure, however, that there were thousands of Jews who
bwent silently and nonviolently to the gas chambers in Ger-
bmany. Is nonviolence always the best policy?
b“It is commendable for JDL to support the ‘law of the
bland’ but there would be no Jew alive today had we not
bbroken the laws of Pharaoh, the Philistines, Antiochus,
bHitler, etc. Would there be an Israel today without the
b‘illegal’ activities of the Irgun . . . ? We may not like it, but
bcountless young Jews have been ‘turned on’ by Kahane and
bthe JDL . . .”
bIt did not matter. On the one hand, nothing could change
bthe Jewish Establishment; and on the other, the Jewish
bmasses were flocking to hear the JDL. In vain did the B’nai
bB’rith order its chapters not to give JDL speakers the right to
bappear; tens of chapters ignored the order and sought JDL
bspeakers. And when synagogues sought Establishment
bspeakers to debate, they fled like the plague after having
bseen the results of some of the early forums.
bThe JDL grew and spread all over the country. A New
bYork Times story of June 28, 1971, headlined “Jewish De-
bfense League Gains Adherents in Cities Across Country,”
bhit the nail on the head, but perhaps the most honest and
bcorrect observations were made by Simon Bloom, editor of
b